Difference between revisions of "Talk:Potions"

Revision as of 17:22, 5 March 2011

I really don't understand the point of including some 3.x potion colors in the same table. If we want a 3.x table I think it should just be stand alone. Tambalor 08:57, 5 March 2011 (MST)

I'd say clean em out, so it's current info, so as not to confuse newbies. :) Cordir 16:22, 5 March 2011 (MST)

Revision as of 09:57, 5 March 2011 (view source) Tambalor (talk \| contribs) (Created page with "* I really don't understand the point of including some 3.x potion colors in the same table. If we want a 3.x table I think it should just be stand alone. ~~~~")		Revision as of 17:22, 5 March 2011 (view source) Cordir (talk \| contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* I really don't understand the point of including some 3.x potion colors in the same table. If we want a 3.x table I think it should just be stand alone. [[User:Tambalor\|Tambalor]] 08:57, 5 March 2011 (MST)		* I really don't understand the point of including some 3.x potion colors in the same table. If we want a 3.x table I think it should just be stand alone. [[User:Tambalor\|Tambalor]] 08:57, 5 March 2011 (MST)

			* I'd say clean em out, so it's current info, so as not to confuse newbies. :) [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 16:22, 5 March 2011 (MST)