Talk:People

• FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. Cordir
• Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? Cordir
  • Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page and also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. Tynian 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)
  • I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?
    • Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! Cordir 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)
• In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? Cordir 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)
  • In my opinion it should be just name only, titles and possibly even full names could be added on the detail page. --Natilena 15:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)