Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Legendary"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
*I think this is definitely interesting and has great potential....I'd like to perhaps see it as hrm, almost a BlissPoll type of item and then posted to the character's wiki, just because some of these areas are super subjective. I'd hate to hear people call 'favorites' even though we'd be selecting them as unbiased as possible. Since quite a few oldies are back that would be willing to participate, it could be fun as well. We could do something like a nomination round, and then follow up with the voting. What are your thoughts? I am game for the moderator selection though as well. Just trying to think of things that might be mentioned. --[[User:Katrana|Katrana]] 18:20, 24 April 2011 (MDT) | *I think this is definitely interesting and has great potential....I'd like to perhaps see it as hrm, almost a BlissPoll type of item and then posted to the character's wiki, just because some of these areas are super subjective. I'd hate to hear people call 'favorites' even though we'd be selecting them as unbiased as possible. Since quite a few oldies are back that would be willing to participate, it could be fun as well. We could do something like a nomination round, and then follow up with the voting. What are your thoughts? I am game for the moderator selection though as well. Just trying to think of things that might be mentioned. --[[User:Katrana|Katrana]] 18:20, 24 April 2011 (MDT) | ||
*There's no formula that covers the subject matter 100%. We could try and figure something out based on different types of "infamy"; there are infamous PKers, infamous explores, infamous roleplayers, etc. I think the easiest, and most hassle free method is to have a panel discussion on induction. Similar to the RoR plaques, this is mighty subjective... | *There's no formula that covers the subject matter 100%. We could try and figure something out based on different types of "infamy"; there are infamous PKers, infamous explores, infamous roleplayers, etc. I think the easiest, and most hassle free method is to have a panel discussion on induction. Similar to the RoR plaques, this is mighty subjective...[[User:Rath|Rath]] | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 24 April 2011
So: How do we define "Legendary"? Is it simply level? Or is it something more esoteric? Is it a singular event or deed? I would like to open this up for discussion, getting the opinions of those who are wiki contributors. I think a minimum of five to six contributors would have to agree, for the category to be added to someone's player page. Cordir 16:39, 24 April 2011 (MDT)
Here's the list of folks that - thus far - have been suggested:
- Cadee - first level 50 bard
- Coleman - injected a level of wit and humor that persists to this day.
- Daelin - 2nd runner up behind Jerald for biggest mouth.
- Dove - Epic Paladin
- Gaul - Epic Paladin
- Grismal - Hardest Hitter in TFC history
- Ginny - Most prolific seductress
- Jerald - Most talkative mortal or immortal ever
- Kaern - Most interesting/daring/adventurous player
- Maldobar - Personification of an Evil PKer
- Maimer - Personification of a Good PKer.
- Molo - Longest tenure and most effective FLI
- Madman - Quest Master Supreme
- Nyx - first level 40 thief/ordained
- Ozymandius - Biggest Ego in TFC history
- Pez - Questing-est, Funniest Mortal Ever
- Ptarchyzk - first level 40 muggle
- Stouthbound - Funniest Damned Ogre Ever (except Oook). Also hit really hard
- Syrinx - First level 50
- Syla -- Most Lovable Goddess
- Thaygar - God of Infinite Creepiness
- Tokugawa - amazing player, very kind AND knowledgeable. Longtime Greater God
- Tynian - The guy who started it all - and kept it going this WHOLE time. :)
- Welverin -
Second Level 50Third level 50 ever (Phooey was second). Prolific PKer. Hard hitter - ZARA - most prolific newbie killer ever.
- I think this is definitely interesting and has great potential....I'd like to perhaps see it as hrm, almost a BlissPoll type of item and then posted to the character's wiki, just because some of these areas are super subjective. I'd hate to hear people call 'favorites' even though we'd be selecting them as unbiased as possible. Since quite a few oldies are back that would be willing to participate, it could be fun as well. We could do something like a nomination round, and then follow up with the voting. What are your thoughts? I am game for the moderator selection though as well. Just trying to think of things that might be mentioned. --Katrana 18:20, 24 April 2011 (MDT)
- There's no formula that covers the subject matter 100%. We could try and figure something out based on different types of "infamy"; there are infamous PKers, infamous explores, infamous roleplayers, etc. I think the easiest, and most hassle free method is to have a panel discussion on induction. Similar to the RoR plaques, this is mighty subjective...Rath