Talk:People - Revision history

Cordir at 15:44, 12 August 2011

2011-08-12T15:44:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:44, 12 August 2011
Line 17:		Line 17:
	*** I guess I was hoping that the People page would be a "Who's Who" page. I've heard people question why certain players are on there; I'm not bringing this up because I care, but because I'm using it to point out -other- people do see the People page that way. Currently, it seems more like an index to PC pages. If that's the intention, that's great. I think it would be cool to start a "Who's Who" page otherwise. Re: your question - that has been the burden of the historian since the dawn of mankind =) [[User:Rath\|Rath]]		*** I guess I was hoping that the People page would be a "Who's Who" page. I've heard people question why certain players are on there; I'm not bringing this up because I care, but because I'm using it to point out -other- people do see the People page that way. Currently, it seems more like an index to PC pages. If that's the intention, that's great. I think it would be cool to start a "Who's Who" page otherwise. Re: your question - that has been the burden of the historian since the dawn of mankind =) [[User:Rath\|Rath]]
	**** True, that. I've removed the '(in)famous individuals' tag from the page to help calm folks down. We've got a discussion going on a Category for Legendary players (which you know, you're already taking part). Hopefully that addresses both concerns? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:45, 26 April 2011 (MDT)		**** True, that. I've removed the '(in)famous individuals' tag from the page to help calm folks down. We've got a discussion going on a Category for Legendary players (which you know, you're already taking part). Hopefully that addresses both concerns? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:45, 26 April 2011 (MDT)


			== Clean Up ==
			* Thank you, [[MikGub]], for all your work on cleaning up the People page, bringing it up to match the Category:People! I was afraid I'd missed some, and wow, that sure proved to be true. I appreciate your help!! - [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 08:44, 12 August 2011 (MST)

Cordir: /* Entry Requirements */

2011-04-26T15:45:44Z

Entry Requirements

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 26 April 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)		** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)
	*** I guess I was hoping that the People page would be a "Who's Who" page. I've heard people question why certain players are on there; I'm not bringing this up because I care, but because I'm using it to point out -other- people do see the People page that way. Currently, it seems more like an index to PC pages. If that's the intention, that's great. I think it would be cool to start a "Who's Who" page otherwise. Re: your question - that has been the burden of the historian since the dawn of mankind =) [[User:Rath\|Rath]]		*** I guess I was hoping that the People page would be a "Who's Who" page. I've heard people question why certain players are on there; I'm not bringing this up because I care, but because I'm using it to point out -other- people do see the People page that way. Currently, it seems more like an index to PC pages. If that's the intention, that's great. I think it would be cool to start a "Who's Who" page otherwise. Re: your question - that has been the burden of the historian since the dawn of mankind =) [[User:Rath\|Rath]]
			**** True, that. I've removed the '(in)famous individuals' tag from the page to help calm folks down. We've got a discussion going on a Category for Legendary players (which you know, you're already taking part). Hopefully that addresses both concerns? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:45, 26 April 2011 (MDT)

Rath at 20:37, 24 April 2011

2011-04-24T20:37:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 24 April 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* Hi Cordir - What do you think of implementing some sort of entry requirements for the "People" page? [[User:Rath\|Rath]] 24 April, 2011.		* Hi Cordir - What do you think of implementing some sort of entry requirements for the "People" page? [[User:Rath\|Rath]] 24 April, 2011.
	** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)		** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)
			*** I guess I was hoping that the People page would be a "Who's Who" page. I've heard people question why certain players are on there; I'm not bringing this up because I care, but because I'm using it to point out -other- people do see the People page that way. Currently, it seems more like an index to PC pages. If that's the intention, that's great. I think it would be cool to start a "Who's Who" page otherwise. Re: your question - that has been the burden of the historian since the dawn of mankind =) [[User:Rath\|Rath]]

Cordir: formatting, added Rath's question

2011-04-24T20:06:35Z

formatting, added Rath's question

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 24 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=== Immortals/Temples: ===

	* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	** Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)		** Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)
	** I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its ~~one~~ page would perhaps satisfy both issues?		** I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its own page would perhaps satisfy both issues? [[User:Tambalor\|Tambalor]]
	*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)		*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)

			=== Retired Players ===
	* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)		* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)
	** In my opinion it should be just name only, titles and possibly even full names could be added on the detail page. --[[User:Natilena\|Natilena]] 15:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)		** In my opinion it should be just name only, titles and possibly even full names could be added on the detail page. --[[User:Natilena\|Natilena]] 15:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)

			=== Entry Requirements ===

			* Hi Cordir - What do you think of implementing some sort of entry requirements for the "People" page? [[User:Rath\|Rath]] 24 April, 2011.
			** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)

Natilena at 21:39, 1 April 2011

2011-04-01T21:39:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 1 April 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)		*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)
	* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)		* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)
			** In my opinion it should be just name only, titles and possibly even full names could be added on the detail page. --[[User:Natilena\|Natilena]] 15:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)

Cordir at 20:39, 1 April 2011

2011-04-01T20:39:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 1 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)		** Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)
	* I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?		** I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?
	* Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)		*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)
			* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)

Cordir at 15:09, 16 March 2011

2011-03-16T15:09:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 16 March 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)		* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)
	* I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?		* I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?
			* Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)

Tambalor at 15:01, 23 January 2011

2011-01-23T15:01:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 23 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)		* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)
	* I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to ~~it's~~ one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?		* I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?

Tambalor at 15:01, 23 January 2011

2011-01-23T15:01:01Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:01, 23 January 2011
Line 2:		Line 2:
	* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)		* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)
			* I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to it's one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?

Tynian at 18:10, 20 January 2011

2011-01-20T18:10:44Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:10, 20 January 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
			* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:45, 26 April 2011
Line 16:		Line 16:
	** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)		** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)
	*** I guess I was hoping that the People page would be a "Who's Who" page. I've heard people question why certain players are on there; I'm not bringing this up because I care, but because I'm using it to point out -other- people do see the People page that way. Currently, it seems more like an index to PC pages. If that's the intention, that's great. I think it would be cool to start a "Who's Who" page otherwise. Re: your question - that has been the burden of the historian since the dawn of mankind =) [[User:Rath\|Rath]]		*** I guess I was hoping that the People page would be a "Who's Who" page. I've heard people question why certain players are on there; I'm not bringing this up because I care, but because I'm using it to point out -other- people do see the People page that way. Currently, it seems more like an index to PC pages. If that's the intention, that's great. I think it would be cool to start a "Who's Who" page otherwise. Re: your question - that has been the burden of the historian since the dawn of mankind =) [[User:Rath\|Rath]]
			**** True, that. I've removed the '(in)famous individuals' tag from the page to help calm folks down. We've got a discussion going on a Category for Legendary players (which you know, you're already taking part). Hopefully that addresses both concerns? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:45, 26 April 2011 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 24 April 2011
Line 15:		Line 15:
	* Hi Cordir - What do you think of implementing some sort of entry requirements for the "People" page? [[User:Rath\|Rath]] 24 April, 2011.		* Hi Cordir - What do you think of implementing some sort of entry requirements for the "People" page? [[User:Rath\|Rath]] 24 April, 2011.
	** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)		** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)
			*** I guess I was hoping that the People page would be a "Who's Who" page. I've heard people question why certain players are on there; I'm not bringing this up because I care, but because I'm using it to point out -other- people do see the People page that way. Currently, it seems more like an index to PC pages. If that's the intention, that's great. I think it would be cool to start a "Who's Who" page otherwise. Re: your question - that has been the burden of the historian since the dawn of mankind =) [[User:Rath\|Rath]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 24 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
			=== Immortals/Temples: ===

	* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	** Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)		** Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)
	** I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its ~~one~~ page would perhaps satisfy both issues?		** I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its own page would perhaps satisfy both issues? [[User:Tambalor\|Tambalor]]
	*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)		*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)

			=== Retired Players ===
	* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)		* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)
	** In my opinion it should be just name only, titles and possibly even full names could be added on the detail page. --[[User:Natilena\|Natilena]] 15:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)		** In my opinion it should be just name only, titles and possibly even full names could be added on the detail page. --[[User:Natilena\|Natilena]] 15:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)

			=== Entry Requirements ===

			* Hi Cordir - What do you think of implementing some sort of entry requirements for the "People" page? [[User:Rath\|Rath]] 24 April, 2011.
			** I'm going to copy this over to the Discussion for the People page so we can get more feedback. As for my opinion: I'll be honest, I don't much like the idea. Here's why: Who is to say who is important and who isn't? If we say, 'only level 40s' ... well, I would never have made it as a mortal. Nor would [[Nyx]]. Or [[Pez]]. Or [[Typhon]]. Or a large number of other really awesome, notable, historical folks. I think if someone wants to put in the work to create a page, then no matter who the subject is, then great! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:01, 24 April 2011 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:39, 1 April 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:
	*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)		*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)
	* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)		* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)
			** In my opinion it should be just name only, titles and possibly even full names could be added on the detail page. --[[User:Natilena\|Natilena]] 15:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:39, 1 April 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* FYI, I posted in the followings that I had temples for... most of them are from 2x or early 3x. I don't have most of the modern era temples - no offense is intended. [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]		* Am wondering if there's a better way to organize this page... any suggestions? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]]
	* Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)		** Do we need to list FLIs at the top of the page ''and'' also in the following table? It adds length, but no real additional information. [[User:Tynian\|Tynian]] 11:10, 20 January 2011 (MST)
	* I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?		** I agree, but I'm also not sure that a followings list is appropriate for the "people" page. Moving the followings list to its one page would perhaps satisfy both issues?
	* Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)		*** Sounds good. I'll do that. Tambalor, great addition to the page, btw. Those sortable tables are cool! [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 09:09, 16 March 2011 (MDT)
			* In regards to the Retired folks... I've been including titles, just for the spiffy factor, but as we add more Retired folks, I also don't want it to get overwhelming. At some point, should we strip out titles and just have the name? or should it be broken off onto its own page? Your thoughts? [[User:Cordir\|Cordir]] 14:39, 1 April 2011 (MDT)